VLA Robot Candidates for Flower Trimming and Bouquet Making

Compares purchasable robot candidates for real flower trimming and bouquet-making tasks across LeRobot support, bimanual manipulation, reach, dexterity, durability, price, open-source status, and customization.

Summary

Flower trimming and bouquet making are harder than simple pick-and-place. The task includes aligning stem lengths, removing leaves, orienting flowers, holding a bundle with one hand while manipulating wrap or string with the other, and potentially using tools. The main buying criteria are bimanual manipulation, workspace reach, swappable grippers/hands, data collection pipeline, and customization headroom.

PriorityCandidateFirst judgment
1OpenArmStrongest combination of official LeRobot support, 7-DoF bimanual arms, low cost, and open-source design.
2ALOHA / ALOHA 2Strongest ACT/VLA research reproduction and bimanual data collection ecosystem.
3Galaxea R1 Pro / A1 dualPurchasable high-performance bimanual/mobile option with force-control advantages.
4Reachy 2Official LeRobot support, VR teleoperation, and humanoid bimanual form factor.
5Dual xArm 7Good reach and payload for the price, but the bimanual VLA stack needs custom integration.
6Dual Franka Research 3Excellent force control and research ecosystem, with high budget and integration cost.
7Unitree G1 EDUInteresting LeRobot-supported humanoid candidate, but walking and safety complexity is high for table flower work.

The practical path is to first validate the LeRobot record/train/inference loop with SO-101 or LeKiwi, then select OpenArm, ALOHA 2, Galaxea R1 Pro, or Reachy 2 as the main experiment platform.

Source Basis for This Update

The shortlist is not based on manufacturer copy alone. It is cross-checked against these sources:

SourceHow it was used
Hugging Face LeRobot official docsFilter robots that are easier to put into record/train/inference workflows
Humanoid Guide / HumanoidSpecs hands directoryBroad recent scan of hands and grippers
Robot Manipulation hardware listWider research-manipulation hardware context
Manufacturer/lab official docsSpec and integration checks for WUJI, ORCA, SharpaWave, and North
Papers and preprintsEvidence for open-source reproducibility, especially ORCA

Evaluation Criteria

CriterionWhy it matters
PurchasabilityDemo-only robots are excluded because the goal is to train and deploy a custom VLA.
LeRobot supportIt shortens the path to recording, training, Hub sharing, and policy deployment.
Bimanual manipulationBouquet work often needs one hand to hold while the other aligns, ties, wraps, or uses tools.
Reach/payloadThe robot must cover flowers, scissors, wrapping paper, vases, and trays on a tabletop.
DexterityContact surface, force control, and end-effector options matter for avoiding damage.
DurabilityRepeated data collection stresses motors, gears, frames, and cables.
Open-source/customizationCameras, custom grippers, safety interlocks, and VLA inference need direct integration.
PriceCameras, compute, grippers, safety cells, and spare parts add to the robot cost.

Official LeRobot Candidates

CandidatePurchase/build pathBimanual fitFlower-task fitMain risk
SO-101Very good low-cost DIY/kit pathSingle or leader-follower pairEntry point for data pipelineReach, torque, and durability are limited
Koch v1.1Good Dynamixel-based DIY/kit pathDual setup possibleLow-cost teleop practicePayload and stiffness are limited
LeKiwiGood SO-101 plus mobile base pathSingle arm by defaultMobile manipulation pipeline validationNo bimanual coordination
OpenArmGood open-source BOM pathOfficial bimanual type supportFirst-choice main experiment candidateYoung ecosystem and supply/build risk
Reachy 2Quoted, high-cost purchaseBimanual plus mobile baseStrong humanoid bouquet-work candidatePrice, procurement, and gripper dexterity
Unitree G1Basic/EDU purchasableHumanoid bimanual armsHumanoid VLA demo candidateEDU access, safety, and shorter arm reach

Main Platform Comparison

CandidateReach/payloadDexterityPrice bandOpen/customVLA fitJudgment
OpenArm7-DoF, 4.1kg nominal/6kg peak per armNeeds end-effector selectionAbout $6.5K bimanual BOMVery highOfficial LeRobot supportFirst candidate to verify procurement for
ALOHA 2ViperX-based, about 750mm reach/light payloadDefault and improved grippersAbout $20K+HighACT/VLA research standardStrong for paper reproduction and live content
Galaxea R1 ProDual 7-DoF arms, kg-class per armG1 gripper/force controlAbout $70K for R1 ProMedium-highNative VLA/ROS ecosystemSaves time at higher cost
Reachy 2Dual 7-DoF arms, 3kg per armDefault gripper may need replacementHigh, quotedOpen-source softwareOfficial LeRobot supportStrong humanoid UX and VR teleop
Dual xArm 7700mm/3.5kgWide gripper optionsAbout $22K+ for two armsGood SDK/ROSCustom integration requiredRobust cell candidate for the price
Dual Franka Research 3855mm/3kg with joint torque sensingExcellent force controlVery highStrong research ecosystemVery high data qualityPremium candidate if budget allows
Dual UR5e/UR10e850-1300mm / 5-12.5kgMany industrial grippersUsed/quotedStrong ROS2Custom integration requiredDurable but needs extra sensing for delicacy

Hand and Gripper Candidates

CandidateCharacterRecommended use
OnRobot Soft GripperSilicone soft gripperDirect flower grasping and wrapping-paper holding
Robotiq 2F/3FIndustrial parallel/3-finger grippersHolding stem bundles, tools, and fixtures
LEAP Hand16-DoF open-source dexterous handIn-hand alignment and dexterity research
WUJI Hand20 active DoF, ROS 2/SDK, around 580 gHigh-DoF experiments on stems, tools, and wrapping paper
ORCA Hand17 DoF open-source hand, Touch lineFingertip modification and tactile datasets
SharpaWave22 active DoF and high-resolution tactile-array claimsPetal/stem contact classification and force-cap research
Allegro Hand16-DoF commercial research handHigher-end dexterous manipulation
Ability HandProsthetic hand with touch sensingReducing damage to petals and stems

The pragmatic first test is not an expensive dexterous hand. Mount OnRobot Soft Gripper or Robotiq 2F with replaceable silicone pads on OpenArm/ALOHA/xArm and measure flower damage. Move to LEAP Hand, WUJI Hand, ORCA Hand, SharpaWave, Ability Hand, or Allegro Hand only if in-hand rotation, tactile force caps, or fine orientation becomes necessary.

Watch-Only Candidate

CandidateJudgment
Sharpa NorthReference platform for SharpaWave hands on a wheeled full-body robot. Keep it as a watch candidate until SDK, pricing, lead time, and safety access are public enough to evaluate.

Buying Scenarios

Budget-Constrained

  1. Validate LeRobot record/train/inference with SO-101 or LeKiwi.
  2. Source or build bimanual OpenArm.
  3. Add silicone pads and simple force/pressure sensing to the base gripper.
  4. Collect data in stages: single flower pick, stem alignment, then simple tying.

Research-Reproduction

  1. Buy or build ALOHA 2 / Trossen ALOHA.
  2. Reproduce ACT/ALOHA baselines.
  3. Fine-tune OpenVLA, SmolVLA, or pi0-style policies.
  4. Define bouquet making as an ALOHA-style benchmark.

Time-Saving

  1. Request quotes for Galaxea R1 Pro or Reachy 2.
  2. Collect human demonstrations through VR/isomorphic teleoperation.
  3. Connect LeRobot or a custom ROS2 data conversion pipeline.
  4. Validate VLA inference inside a safety cell.

Archive Version

The longer live-content research report is also available in the Archive version.

References

See Also